Case study · August 4 to October 22, 2026
Epic Glass & Tinting, an auto glass and window tint shop in Klamath Falls, Oregon, a town of about 22,000. The owner was good at the work and known for it: the most reviewed shop of his kind in the county. The work was never the problem.
His host had suspended the website. The domain served an error page, the certificate was untrusted, and the ads he was paying for every month were still pointing at it. His Yelp page sat unclaimed at 4.4 from nineteen reviews while his Google profile carried 4.6 from 157, and the AI assistants were reading the wrong one.
This is the eleven weeks after. Almost everything below is a screenshot of Google, of his own Google accounts, or of his own records, each one dated.
Quote requests counted off the actual enquiries in his inbox, August 4 to October 22, with tests and spam taken out. Phone taps from Google Analytics; tap tracking started August 14, so the first month is undercounted. Google clicks from Search Console, August 13 to October 20. There is no “before” for any of this: the month before, his domain served an error page and Google had nothing to show.


“Steve built us an awesome website! Our old site was outdated. The new one shows customers that we are professional. He is continually editing the site to make it better. The site was up within like 2 days. We couldn’t be happier with the results!!”
How I got the job
Day zero


Before building anything
The shops ahead of him on Google’s map had fewer reviews and higher ratings. He already had the most reviews of any glass shop in town, so the lever was turning reviews into calls and keeping new ones coming, not more pages.
Nobody owned one message. One rival sells thirty years local, another sells cheap, and nobody could say tint, glass and the camera calibration in one trip. No other Klamath Falls shop I found does all three in-house. That became his headline. On the windshield search, Safelite’s ad sits above the map; the local shops mostly aren’t buying.
I went through sixteen months of his job calendar, every entry. His goal was “better winters.” His own calendar said February was his busiest month and the dips were August and November, so I didn’t sell him a winter campaign. Three of every four vehicles on it were trucks and SUVs, so the site speaks to work trucks in a mountain town, not sports cars.
The website








His listings and his reviews

The uncomfortable part
He was paying a geo-targeted ad company about $550 a month, his figure. I got into their dashboard and measured it against his own Google data.

| Last 30 days | His ads | Free Google search |
|---|---|---|
| Visits to his website, by his site’s own count | 95 | 159 |
| Quote requests | 1 | 13 |
| Cost | about $550 a month | nothing |
I am not telling you your ads are wasted; I do not know what you are spending or who runs them. I am telling you that is a question worth asking out loud, because it was worth asking here, and nobody had.
What moved on Google
| Search, from Klamath Falls | Web result, July | Web result, October 7 |
|---|---|---|
| windshield replacement | 3rd | 1st |
| windshield repair | 3rd | 1st |
| auto glass | 3rd | 1st |
| rock chip repair | — | 1st |
| oakley sunglasses | not shown | 1st |
| window tint · car window tinting | 1st | 1st (held) |
| window tinting · auto window tint | — | 1st |
| home window tinting · commercial window tinting | 1st | 1st (held) |
| paint protection film | not shown | 2nd |
— means not tracked in July. Each October search was run from Klamath Falls with personalization off; the position is epicglass.com among the web results under the map.



Since then. On October 21, from a clean browser with no sign-in, his site was still the first web result on all four searches I read: windshield replacement, auto glass, window tint and car tint. On the map he sat third on all four.
Earlier in October he was first on the map for window tint. He slid to third, behind two shops with “tint” in their business names. I think I know why, and I am working on it. I would rather show you the slide than hide it.
Google’s own AI answer named him and nobody else. ChatGPT has not been as kind; the last time I checked, it still had him behind shops with fewer reviews. Not fixed, and I am not going to pretend it is.
The leads

| Quote requests | Taps on his number | |
|---|---|---|
| First month (Aug 4 – Sep 3) | 21 | 9* |
| Second month (Sep 4 – Oct 3) | 19 | 19 |
| Since then (Oct 4 – 22) | 16 | 31 |
| Eleven weeks (Aug 4 – Oct 22) | 56 | 59* |
*Tap tracking started August 14. Quote requests counted off the actual enquiries, so totals differ slightly from Analytics.
From his quote inbox. Names and phone numbers removed.
September’s 19: 10 tint, 8 windshield or auto glass, 1 house. 10 of the 19 picked “as soon as possible.”


What 20 a month would be worth in your shop
$2,400a month, at your numbers
The only figure here that is mine is the 20 a month: fifty-six quote requests in eleven weeks, rounded down. The job value and the close rate are yours — I am not going to tell you what your work is worth.
Every month
Leads from his quote inbox and Google Analytics, August 4 to October 22, 2026. Web results read October 7 from Klamath Falls with personalization off; the map and AI reads are from October 5; the October 21 line is from a clean browser with no sign-in. A “lead” means a quote form sent or a tap on his phone number — not a booked job; only he knows how many of those closed. Rank readings go stale after a fortnight; ask me to run it again. Published with David Pratt’s permission.